Wade v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mitchell v. State · Espinosa v. State · Cameron v. State · Ex Parte Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficient to determine whether a defendant is uninfluenced by any consideration of fear or persuasion of delusive hope of pardon. This approach was rejected by the concurrence. [3] In light of other earlier opinions of the majority, one is left to wonder the meaning of the trial court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guster v. State“Are you pleading guilty because you are guilty and for no other reason?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guster v. State“in pleading guilty was uninfluenced by any consideration of fear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guster v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.