Vondras v. Titanium Research & Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2013
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wood v. . Duff-Gordon · Griswold v. Heat Corporation · 233 Mo. App. 212 - Beebe v. the Columbia Axle Co. · Berry Ex Rel. Nay v. Kansas City Public Service Co. · Hudson v. Browning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Your verdict must be for plaintiff, if you believe: First, defendant offered to (set out terms of offer) if plaintiff would (set out terms of plaintiff’s performance), and Second, plaintiff performed the act[s] called for in such an offer with the intent to accept such offer, and Third, defendant knew of such performance, and Fourth, defendant thereafter did not perform what he so offered, and Fifth, plaintiff was thereby damaged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.