State v. McKenna’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2016
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · Morris v. D'AMARIO · State v. Santos · State v. Espinosa · State v. Dionne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A defendant shall not be acquitted * * * on the ground of variance between the allegation and proof if the essential elements of the crime are correctly stated in the * * * information * * * unless he is thereby prejudiced in his defense. He shall not be acquitted * * * by reason of failure to prove unnecessary allegations in the description of the crime * * * ft”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Markarian“Unless or until a second prosecution is commenced, defendant’s double-jeopardy challenge is speculative and not ripe for consideration by this court.”); Bailey v. State, 100 Nev. 562 , 688 P.2d 320, 322 (1984) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.