Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 F.2d 182 - United States v. Keller

United States v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

512 F.2d 182 · 1975

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Sblendorio (1987), United States v. Marchand (1977)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

18019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 472

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Holland v. United States · Barnes v. United States · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a conviction cannot stand when it rests solely on an identification as uncertain as this one”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even though his attention was specifically directed to the defendants” and where there was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.