Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 F.2d 258 - Edwards v. Associated Press

Edwards v. Associated Press’s Empirical Analysis

512 F.2d 258 · 1975

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably Thompson v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (1985), DeMelo v. Toche Marine, Inc. (1983)

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

2701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The goal of the single publication rule as to venue is to protect the defendant from a multiplicity of suits, from a continuous tolling of the statute of limitations, and from the application of diverse laws to a single event. See Prosser, Law of Torts § 113 (4th ed. 1971). Rather than accomplish these necessary goals through the jurisdictional statutes, however, they may be more logically effectuated through requiring the plaintiff to collect all his damages in a single action, measuring the running of the statute of limitations from the initial publication, see, e.g., Forman, supra, 195 Miss. at 107 , 14 So.2d at 347 ..."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) The non-resident defendant or foreign corporation must purposely do some act or consummate some transaction in the forum state, (2) the cause of action must arise from, or be connected with, such act or transaction, and (3) The assumption of jurisdiction by the forum state must not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice, consideration being given to the quality, nature and extent of the activity in the forum state, the relative convenience of the parties, the benefits and protection of the laws óf the forum state afforded the respective parties, and the basic equities of the situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “AP’s activities in Mississippi indicate that AP has engaged in sufficient local activity to justify, under the due process clause, Mississippi’s exercise of its jurisdiction. AP maintains five news correspondents in Mississippi as well as a maintenance employee. Moreover, these employees occupy an office in the state, although the office is offered without rent by two AP members and it is not designated as an AP office in the building directory. More significantly, the news report upon which plaintiff’s libel action is predicated was aimed exclusively at Mississippi.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.