Short v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
512 F.2d 374 · 1975
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably In Re First Federal Savings And Loan Association Of Durham (1988), Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Costle (1978)
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Holland v. United States · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) taxpayer who may be the subject of a criminal recommendation will be afforded a District Intelligence conference when he requests one or where the Chief, Intelligence Division, makes a determination that such a conference will be in the best interests of the Government.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“mandatory or ministerial obligation. If the alleged duty is discretionary or directory, the duty is not 'owed.' " Short v. Murphy, 512 F.2d 374 , 377 (6th Cir.1975). A duty is not "owed”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(t)his Rule was never meant to be an instrument for pre-trial discovery such as provided by Fed.R.Crim.P. 16, or the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500. Those rights accrue after indictment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.