Noe v. Weinberger’s Empirical Analysis
512 F.2d 588 · 1975
Citation profile
26 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Allen v. Califano (1980), Hephner v. Mathews (1978)
26 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ber v. Celebrezze · Miracle v. Celebrezze · Sayers v. Gardner · Whitson v. Finch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“work which exists in the national economy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] decision on whether the claimant is disabled cannot be made based on work activity or on medical facts alone. [T]he record establishes that the claimant cannot perform her past relevant work. However, considering the claimant's residual functional capacity and her age, education, and past work experience, the Administrative Law Judge further concludes that there are other jobs which the claimant can perform and that such jobs exist in significant numbers in the national economy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“. physical or mental impairment is an impairment that results from anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormalities which are demonstrable by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thedorf v. Califano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.