Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 F.2d 899 - Frith v. Blazon-Flexible Flyer, Inc.

Frith v. Blazon-Flexible Flyer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

512 F.2d 899 · 1975

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Lou v. Belzberg (1987), Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co. (1998)

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

10019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Toucey v. New York Life Insurance · Turner v. Louisiana · De Leon v. United States · Frank W. Parks and John Patterson v. The New York Times Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an attempt to subvert the purposes of the removal statute.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the second suit was not brought in an attempt to subvert the purposes of the removal statute and was not aimed at defeating federal jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where no fraud is found, the second action brought in state court should not be enjoined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.