Mathai v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
512 F.3d 1241 · 2008
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Johnson v. Riebesell (2009), Scrivner v. Mashburn (2008)
13 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc. · Farmers Co-operative Ass'n v. Strunk · Gullickson v. Brown · Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Tveten · Hanson v. First National Bank in Brookings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]ay avoid any transfer (including any transfer to or for the benefit of an insider under an employment contract) of an interest of the debtor in property, or any obligation (including any obligation to or for the benefit of an insider under an employment contract) incurred by the debtor, that was made or incurred on or within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, if the debtor voluntarily or involuntarily — (B)(i) received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or obligation; and (ii) ... (IV) made such transfer to or for the benefit of an insider, or incurred such obligation to or for the benefit of an insider, under an employment contract and not in the ordi nary course of business. 4”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a debtor's right to make full use of statutory exemptions is fundamental to bankruptcy law.”); and In re Carey, 938 F.2d 1073 (10th Cir.1991) (holding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Werts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.