Charles v. Grief

Decided Jan. 7, 2008.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2008

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 2008-01-07

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2Robert Wayne Schmidt, Crews Law Firm, Austin, TX, for Charles.

¶3R. Ted Cruz, William T. Deane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for Grief.

¶4Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

¶5 *754PER CURIAM:

¶6IT IS ORDERED that the Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, treated as a petition for panel rehearing, is GRANTED.

¶7IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the original panel opinion in this appeal is withdrawn and vacated, nunc pro tunc, and thus is without effect.

¶8IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal remains under submission pending further disposition by this panel.