Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

512 F. App'x 354

Clay v. Sharp

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2013

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2013-02-28

Decided 2013-02-28

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. P. Trevor Sharp, 1:10-cv-00891-TDSLPA (M.D.N.C. July 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 AFFIRMED.

/512/fappx/354 · .json · Public domain