Howard Moniz v. Michael Cox’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Heck v. Humphrey · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Liteky et al United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o sustain a claim under section 1985(3), a claimant must prove both membership in a protected class and discrimination on account of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“allege that the conspiracy was motivated by racial, or other class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.