Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 FSUPP 1321 - Humphreys v. Pierce

Humphreys v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2002

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

30198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When jurisdiction is sought pursuant to the Virginia long-arm statute, a two-step inquiry is required: first, it must be determined whether the statutory language permits service of process on the non-resident defendant; and second, it must be determined whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction under the statute is consonant with the due process clause of the United States Constitution [cites omitted]. These two steps are interrelated, however, as the Virginia Long-Arm statute is a “deliberate and conscious effort on the part of the General Assembly of Virginia to assert jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the extent permissible by the due process clause.” Carmichael v. Snyder, 209 Va. 451, 456 , 164 S.E.2d 703, 707 (1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.