Mulvaney v. Stetson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1982
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Mulvaney v. Stetson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have analyzed the 628-page Military Personnel record. We have told the Board what is in that record. We spoke advisedly when we said on July 10, 1980, “[w]e are confident that the Board will reach a different result after reviewing the totality of the present record.” At that point we dropped a footnote in which we said, “As we indicated earlier, it is unclear whether the Corrections Board gave any credence to the plaintiff’s allegations regarding the scheme Lindstrum coerced plaintiff into accepting. In light of our review of the present record, such a position by the Board upon rehearing would clearly be untenable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mulvaney v. Stetson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.