Washington v. Kroger Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 1982
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any work directed solely at the defendant Union was both minimal and practically impossible to remove from the major preparation directed at proving plaintiff's case against Kroger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as a practical matter, it does not appear that counsel for plaintiff were compensated for any time spent exclusively on plaintiff's claim against the Union.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.