Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 NE2D 215 - Frazier v. State

Frazier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shippen v. State · Royal v. State · 180 Ind. App. 698 - Banton v. State · Young v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute provides that the court shall determine whether terms of imprisonment shall be served consecutively. There must, of course, be at least two terms of imprisonment involved before there is anything for the statute to operate upon. We believe the language employed by the legislature necessarily presupposes that when the critical (second) sentence is imposed so as to invoke the statute, the other sentence(s) must already have been imposed or at least, must be imposed contemporaneously therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.