Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 NE2D 865 - Persinger v. Lucas

Persinger v. Lucas’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2013

18 state decisions

901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 23 Cal. 2d 840 - Valencia v. Shell Oil Co. · 154 Ind. App. 632 - Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. Bailey · 140 Ind. App. 426 - New York Central Railroad v. Churchill · Chlopek v. Schmall · 164 Ind. App. 516 - Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Shepler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the time required to determine that the property is unrepairable, the nature of the property, market availability of a replacement, the time required to locate a replacement, the availability and time required to obtain financing, the plaintiffs efforts to locate and obtain a replacement, the plaintiffs efforts to locate and obtain financing, the defendant’s good or bad faith efforts to settle or litigate, and the plaintiffs financial ability to obtain a replacement.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A judgment is not excessive unless the amount cannot be explained upon any basis other than prejudice, passion, partiality, corruption, or some other improper element.... A damage award must be supported by probative evidence and cannot be based on mere speculation, conjecture, or surmise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “limited to the reasonable amount of time necessary for replacement, including a reasonable amount of time to determine if the property is repairable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.