Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 NW2D 168 - Union County v. Hoffman

Union County v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hilde v. Flood · Langerman v. Langerman · Town of Colton v. South Dakota Cent. Land Co. · Selle v. Pierce · Hersrud v. Hersrud

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A nuisance consists in unlawfully doing an act, or omitting to perform a duty, which act or omission either: (1) Annoys, injures, or endangers the... health, or safety of others; ... (4) In any way renders other persons insecure in life, or in the use of property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Every municipality shall have power to declare what shall constitute a nuisance and prevent, abate, and remove the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.