State v. Hofer’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably Connecticut v. Porter (1997), Christian v. Gray (2003)
1 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Stephens v. Secretary · Drabkin v. Grant · 162 Wis. 2d 96 - In RE MARRIAGE OF NICHOLS v. Nichols
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Aesoph · State v. Huber“applies to any body of known facts or to any body of ideas inferred from such facts or accepted as truths on good grounds.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.