Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 NW2D 597 - State v. Sejnoha

State v. Sejnoha’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2010

7 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garcia · State v. Trog · State v. Hennessy · State v. Love · State v. Hemmings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the district court has an opportunity to actually observe the defendant throughout the proceedings, a reviewing court must defer to the district court’s assessment of the sincerity and depth of the remorse and what weight it should receive in the sentencing decision. The presence or absence of remorse can be a very significant factor in determining whether a defendant is particularly amenable to probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.