Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 P2D 829 - Stanley v. State

Stanley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
7
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2017

9 state decisions

4019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 71 Wash. 2d 705 - State v. Roadhs · Ryans v. State · Jackson v. State · Byington v. State · Wofford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The accused was found, without explanation, inside of the lumber yard with the testimony of three witnesses indicating the top of the gate fence had been 'bent down,' a condition apparently not existing prior to the entry. In RoadkAs, supra, the court held the severance of three strands of wire at the top of a fence was sufficient to constitute a breaking. Likewise, considering the Oklahoma rule which generally sets forth a burglary may be an act of physical force, however slight, by which an obstruction to entry is forcibly removed, the evidence of force applied to the gate was sufficient to constitute a breaking."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Every person who breaks and enters any building ... in which any property is kept, . . . with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the second degree.” (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.