512 So. 2d 1085 - Ree v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2012
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State · 454 So. 2d 691 - Jackson v. State · 478 So. 2d 51 - Florida Bar v. Winter · 463 So. 2d 313 - Oden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t [is] reversible error for the trial court to depart from the guidelines without providing a contemporaneous written statement of the reasons therefore at the time each sentence was pronounced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Must a trial court produce written reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines at the sentencing hearing?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ree v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.