Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 So. 2d 1283 - Baugh v. Baugh

512 So. 2d 1283 - Baugh v. Baugh’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 444 So. 2d 358 - Brown v. Credit Center, Inc. · Terwilliger v. . Wands · 448 So. 2d 271 - Ferguson v. Watkins · 498 So. 2d 1215 - Fulton v. Mississippi Publishers Corp. · 485 So. 2d 306 - Gray v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clear and unmistakable from the words themselves and not the product of any innuendo, speculation or conjecture,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “However, the Baugh case itself considered whether the appellant's former daughter-in-law slandered him by telling a social security employee that she was not aware that her former father-in-law was disabled nor that he wore a neck brace. We found that these statements did not rise to such a level as to suggest that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[r]ule 9(g), Miss. R.Civ.P., requires that in cases where special damages are alleged they must be charged with particularity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.