Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 So. 2d 204 - State v. Sanders

512 So. 2d 204 - State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · In re Rules of Criminal Procedure · 492 So. 2d 1308 - Williams v. State · 468 So. 2d 276 - Von Carter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “CAN THE TRIAL JUDGE DEPART DOWNWARD FROM THE GUIDELINES IF THE DEFENDANT HAS NO PRIOR CONVICTIONS OR ARRESTS AND IF THE JUDGE BELIEVES THE DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT RECEIVE A SENTENCE MORE SEVERE THAN A CO-PERPETRATOR OF THE SAME CRIME WHO HAS BEEN THE RECIPIENT OF A PLEA BARGAIN?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.