Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 So. 2d 802 - Ellington v. State

512 So. 2d 802 - Ellington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 460 So. 2d 1219 - Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of Hartselle · 419 So. 2d 219 - Gulledge v. State · Blair v. Greene · 420 So. 2d 828 - Howard v. State · Brock v. City of Anniston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision of whether or not to seek to proceed against a juvenile in an adult criminal proceeding is an adversarial decision particularly within the scope of the prosecuting authorities who must carry the burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.