512 So. 2d 811 - Self v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2002
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Baldwin v. Alabama · Cotton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia · Clemmons v. State · Ex Parte Baldwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'When deciding whether to grant youthful offender status, it is expected that the nature of the crime charged, along with prior convictions of the defendant, will be considered, as well as any other matters deemed relevant by the court. No prescribed format is required. Neither is the trial court required to articulate on the record the reasons for denying youthful offender status to a defendant.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[E]ven if the report was not properly admitted under the business record exception (the State [argues that] it was proper under this exception), it was 'rendered prejudicially innocuous' by the other testimony to the same effect. 'The rule is that testimony apparently illegal upon admission may be rendered prejudicially innocuous by subsequent or prior legal testimony to the same effect or from which the same facts can be inferred. Yelton v. State , 294 Ala. 340 , 317 So.2d 331 (1974); Holm v. State , 416 So.2d 782 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).' Bell v. State , 466 So.2d 167 , 174 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a typewritten transcript of a recorded conversation is admissible where the officer who listened to the conversation at the time of the recording testifies that the transcript accurately reflected the conversation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.