Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 So. 2d 922 - Kight v. State

512 So. 2d 922 - Kight v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State (1992), 571 So. 2d 415 - Campbell v. State (1990)

51 state decisions

2801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Bell v. Wolfish · Edwards v. Arizona · Jackson v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's rejection of these mitigating circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[u]nder section 90.701, before a lay witness may testify in the form of inference and opinion the party offering the testimony must establish that the witness cannot [otherwise] readily, and with equal accuracy and adequacy, communicate what he has perceived to the trier of fact' and that the witness' `use of inferences or opinions will not mislead the trier of fact to the prejudice of the objecting party.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “These points of similarity `pervade the compared factual situations' and when taken as a whole are `so unusual as to point to the defendant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.