Anderson v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2008
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remington Rand, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc. · State Board of Dental Examiners v. Savelle · Church of Christ v. McDonald · Remington Rand, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Professional Conduct” of a funeral director or funeral home would certainly include efficiency, accuracy, and fidelity in the handling of funds received on behalf of a customer. Therefore failure to show these virtues would be “unprofessional conduct.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, page 1707, contains the following definition: “UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. That which is by general opinion considered to be grossly unprofessional because immoral or dishonorable. State Board of Dental Examiners v. Savelle, 90 Colo. 177 , 8 P.2d 693, 697 . That which violates ethical code of profession or such conduct which is unbecoming member of profession in good standing. People v. Gorman, 346 Ill. 432 , 178 N.E. 880, 885 . It involves breach of duty which professional ethics enjoin. People v. Johnson, 344 Ill. 132 , 176 N.E. 278, 282 .” See also authorities annotated under the title, “Unprofessional Conduct.” 43A Words and Phrases, 83.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Counsel . . . conceded that the transcript . . . was correct and complete except . . . [for] argu ment of counsel and comments of the Chancellor . . 512 S.W.2d 300 , and “Nevertheless, since it appears that ap-pellee does not question the correctness of the record from the Board and does not assert that any benefit would be derived by this Court from the argument and comments which were omitted from the bill of exceptions, no useful purpose would be served by such a remand for further proceedings.” 512 S.W.2d, p. 301.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Steele
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.