Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 512 SW2D 97 - Paster v. Tussey

Paster v. Tussey’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

8019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 241A

Relies on Lemon v. Kurtzman · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · Everson v. Board of Education · Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York · Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no money shall ever be taken from the public treasury, directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect or denomination of religion ... and that no preference shall be given to nor any discrimination made against any church, sect or creed of religion, or any form of religious faith or worship.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not only more explicit but more restrictive than the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This case involves the expenditure of `state' funds and not the expenditure of `federal' funds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.