Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 A2D 226 - In Re Reback

In Re Reback’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

110 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Matter of Addams (1990), In Re Hutchinson (1987)

110 state decisions

3901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · In Re Roundtree · Matter of Haupt · Matter of Smith · Matter of Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Most important is the fact that [the accused attorneys] ... have had unblemished records.... This factor weighs heavily in favor of imposing upon them the lightest sanction that will serve the purpose of Bar discipline.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “adopt the recommended disposition of the Board unless to do so would foster a tendency toward inconsistent dispositions for comparable conduct or otherwise would be unwarranted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.