Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 1137 - Alover Distributors, Inc. v. Kroger Co.

Alover Distributors, Inc. v. Kroger Co.’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 1137 · 1975

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2008

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

1201975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Kosuga · Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corporation · United Protective Workers v. Ford Motor Co. · Vincent W. Kosuga v. Jack H. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may not be awarded on the basis of conjecture or speculation and the admitted fact of damage is insufficient to prove the amount of damage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.