Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

May 30, 1975.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1975-05-30

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kruse v. Hampton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1975-05-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1998

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

William H. McDermott, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Morton Hollander, Eloise E. Davies, Stephen F. Eilperin, Washington, D. C., Dept. of Justice, for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Virgil Pittman, Chief Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties at oral argument, we have determined that appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. --- F.Supp. --- (S.D.Ala.1975).

¶2

Affirmed.