Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 1264 - Maness v. Williams

Maness v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 1264 · 1975

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 1996 · most notably Blau v. Del Monte Corporation (1985), Miles v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund Employee Pension Benefit Plan (1983)

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

280197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Griggs Equipment, Inc. · 166 F. Supp. 346 - Ruth v. Lewis · Arthur Brune v. Charles J. Morse · Hayes v. Morse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the Trustees impose a standard not required by the pension plan itself, this court has stated that such action 'would result in an unwarranted and arbitrary construction of the Plan.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) Break In Service, within the meaning of the Plan, shall occur if an employee is not in covered employment for a period of five consecutive years between February 1, 1955, and April 1, 1969, ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Continuous Service as an Employee under a Collective Bargaining Agreement shall mean accumulated years of employment prior to retirement calculated from the employee’s last employment or re-employment date following the last break in service and excluding years of service not covered under a collective bargaining agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.