Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 277 - Louis D. Lamberti v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Louis D. Lamberti v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 277 · 1975

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably Galtieri v. Wainwright (1978), Nobles v. Johnson (1997)

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Picard v. Connor · Blackledge v. Perry · Smith v. Goguen · WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDEN · Humphrey v. Cady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A habeas petitioner need not spell out each syllable of his claim before the state courts in order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement of § 2254(b). It suffices that the substantial equivalent of a petitioner’s federal habeas claim has been argued in the state proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Ordinarily a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus must exhaust available state remedies with respect to each claim in his habeas petition, or his petition will be denied by the federal courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.