United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
513 F.2d 72 · 1975
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · Cardwell v. Lewis · New York Shipping Ass'n v. Federal Maritime Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rests upon an abhorrence of the concealment of material arguing for innocence by one arguing for guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Calley v. Callaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.