Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 895 - John C. Sheehan v. Frank P. Doyle

John C. Sheehan v. Frank P. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 895 · 1975

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably United States v. Sorren (1979), In re Worksite Inspection of Quality Products, Inc. (1979)

25 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

19019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Natta v. Hogan · Hogan v. Zletz · Natta v. Zletz · Gladrow v. Weisz · Frilette v. Kimberlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A discovery order is not usually 'final' and hence not immediately appealable as the litigation in conjunction with which the discovery is sought is still pending in the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “concluded at least for the moment the business of the district court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.