Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 969 - Young v. Anderson

Young v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 969 · 1975

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · Cupp v. Naughten · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Wingo v. Wedding · First National Bank v. Dickinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. not every trial error or infirmity which might call for application of supervisory powers correspondingly constitutes a “failure to observe that fundamental fairness essential to the very concept of justice.” Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219 , 236 [ 62 S.Ct. 280 , 290, 86 L.Ed. 166 ] (1941).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “statements expressing an advocate's personal belief in the merits of the case are to be deplored.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.