Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 F.2d 982 - American Roller Co. v. Budinger

American Roller Co. v. Budinger’s Empirical Analysis

513 F.2d 982 · 1975

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
6
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently January 2002 · most notably Woods v. Covington County Bank (1976), United States v. Collins (1990)

33 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

3701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Eisenstadt v. Baker · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · 113 F. Supp. 265 - T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc. · Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'may be the appearance of a possible violation of confidences' even though this may not be true in fact.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'leaves little leeway for the exercise of discretion.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is the possibility that confidences might be breached and not the fact of their disclosure or use that dictates disqualification once a substantial relationship between two representations has been established. (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.