Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
513 F.3d 331 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1333 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 46 U.S.C. § 10601 · 46 U.S.C. § 11107
Relies on Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson · Warner v. Goltra · Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. · Larios v. Victory Carriers, Inc. · Picciotto v. Continental Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In an admiralty case, maritime law and the equitable doctrine of laches govern the time to sue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it [would be] prejudicial to Defendants to be required to pay over money to Plaintiffs that had already been distributed to the other crewmen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the three-year limitation period for unpaid wage claims in Rhode Island law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.