Prostyakov v. Masco Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
513 F.3d 716 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2023
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 12 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Hill v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company · Mary Decker Slaney v. The International Amateur Athletic Federation and the United States Olympic Committee · Baravati v. Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Inc. · George Watts & Son, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e accept ... findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and review questions of law de novo .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.