513 F. Supp. 2d 586 - Aikens v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Butz v. Economou · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Chappell v. Wallace · United States v. Stanley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At bottom, plaintiff seeks to rescind the resignation letter contained in his military record. In so doing, he relies on the Fourth Amendment and on Army Regulation 380-19. However, plaintiffs “failure to exhaust intraservice administrative remedies [makes] his federal claim a nonjusticiable military controversy.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aikens v. Ingram · Aikens v. Ingram
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.