Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · White v. State · Twyman v. State · Perry v. State · Morrison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Of course, unless the record reveals that the defendant knew or was advised at the time of his plea that he was waiving his right to a jury trial, his right of confrontation and his right against self-incrimination, Boykin will require that his conviction be vacated. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duncanson v. State“The right of confrontation guarantees a criminal defendant the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses against him. The trial court did not inform Rose of his right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, nor did the advisements given convey this right to him. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duncanson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.