Cano v. REV. BD., EMP. SEC. DIV.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “would be a fatal noncompliance, preventing the Review Board from acquiring jurisdiction over the parties or the case”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Szymanski v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development · Szymanski v. REVIEW BD. DEPT. OF WORKFORCE DEV. & ROSELAND POLICE DEPT.

2. “The rule is well-established in Indiana that where a statute providing for judicial review of an administrative order or decision contains a provision as to time for appeal, such provisions are mandatory as a condition precedent to the acquiring of jurisdiction of such an appeal.... [The failure of a party] to file a notice of intention to appeal the decision of the referee "within fifteen (15) days after the date of notification or mailing of the referee's decision" would be a fatal noncompliance, preventing the Review Board from acquiring jurisdiction over the parties or the case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Charles A. Beard Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Board of School Trustees

3. “The parties shall be duly notified of such [referee's] decision and the reasons therefor, which shall be deemed to be the final decision of the review board, unless within fifteen (15) days after the date of notification or mailing of such decision, an appeal is taken by the board or the director or by any party adversely affected by such decision to the review board.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Charles A. Beard Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Board of School Trustees