Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

513 P.2d 343

Brinlee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1973-08-08

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2004

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1973-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BACON, Judge

¶1(specially concurring).

¶2I concur with my colleagues in the dismissal of this appeal. While it is my strong belief that every appeal should be considered on its merits, that belief is predicated upon the premise that an appellant will conduct himself and his appeal in a manner prescribed by the laws of the state of Oklahoma. By the appellant’s voluntary act of escaping from confinement in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary and becoming a fugitive from justice while all conscientious efforts are being made by his attorneys to protect his rights on appeal of a valid judgment and sentence, the appellant himself has foreclosed his own right to have his appeal further considered on the merits. Under the cases cited above it is clearly the settled law in the state of Oklahoma that dismissal of this appeal is therefore proper.

/513/p2d/343 · .json · Public domain