Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 P2D 412 - Schakel v. State

Schakel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2009

6 state decisions

301973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McLaughlin v. Florida · Carrington v. Rash · Toomer v. Witsell · Johnson v. Stevenson · State v. Langley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “impossible to reconcile with the theory of safety unless one indulges in the violent presumption that mere residence in this State makes a competent, knowing guide * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"* * * This trust relationship would give the State the power and the duty to preserve, protect, and nurture the wild game — not an arbitrary power to make discriminatory laws affecting the hunting thereof."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.