Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 Pa. 169 - Commonwealth v. Morris

Commonwealth v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably Commonwealth v. Tilley (1991), Commonwealth v. Jones (1996)

52 state decisions

310198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Commonwealth v. Clair · Lascaris v. Shirley · Commonwealth v. Allen · Commonwealth v. Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, evidence of crimes unrelated to the charge for which the defendant is being tried, is inadmissible ... There is no per se rule that requires a new trial for a defendant every time there is a reference to prior criminal activity ... ‘[W]e have never ascribed to the view that all improper references to prior criminal activities necessarily require the award of a new trial as the only effective remedy.’ ... Further, the reference to prior criminal activity must be prejudicial to the defendant, with prejudice resulting ‘where the testimony conveys to the jury, either expressly or by reasonable implication, the fact of a prior criminal offense.’ However, it is possible to eradicate any possible prejudice resulting from reference to prior criminal activity by the defendant____ An immediate curative instruction to the jury may alleviate any harm to the defendant that results from reference to prior criminal conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e have never ascribed to the view that all improper references to prior criminal activities necessarily require the award of a new trial as the only effective remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.