Love v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Cupp v. Murphy · Schutt v. Macduff · 254 Pa. Super. 233 - Commonwealth v. Funk · State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ompliance with the act is not the exclusive means for admitting evidence of blood alcohol test results,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“when there is probable cause to believe the motorist was driving while intoxicated and exigent circumstances are present,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Love“Interpretation of Implied Consent Laws by the Courts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Love
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.