Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

513 So. 2d 260

513 So.2d 260

12 Fla.L.Weekly 2356

Greenberg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1987

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-10-02

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-10-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2008

4 state decisions

20198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized after he was stopped by a police officer. The appeal filed is timely and is properly before us. We conclude that the trial court committed no error in denying appellant’s motion for su-pression of evidence, and accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

¶2We do, however, remand the case to the trial court for correction of the order of probation entered on count three of the amended information to reflect that appellant was adjudicated guilty and placed on two years’ probation for the offense of possession of a controlled substance as charged in count three, rather than carrying a concealed firearm as now appears on the order. In all other respects, the orders of probation entered on counts one, two, and three of the amended information are affirmed.

¶3These corrections may be made without the necessity of appellant appearing before the trial court.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., HALL, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.
/513/so2d/260 · .json · Public domain