Crenshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2014
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 385 So. 2d 1298 - Norman v. State · 409 So. 2d 1337 - Hickombottom v. State · 451 So. 2d 694 - Jesco, Inc. v. Shannon · 471 So. 2d 375 - Trapp v. Cayson · Trustees of Wade Baptist v. MISS. ST. HWY.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he purpose of an opening statement is to inform the jury what a party to the litigation expects the proof to show. Sometimes the proof does not follow the expectations of the party's attorney in opening statement and, if so, that failure usually militates against the party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“actually quoting the testimony of appellant taken from the record . . . do[es] not constitute error . . . [and is] entirely proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moss v. State“[i]t is elementary that photographs, moving or still, recordings and admissions by defendants are admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.