Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 513 SW2D 39 - Walker v. State

Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nicholas v. State · White v. State · Sensabaugh v. State · Moulton v. State · Hayles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court will not reverse a conviction solely because an improper question was propounded. To cause reversal the question must be obviously harmful. Walker v. State, 513 S.W.2d 39, 42 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Hartman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.